Saturday, July 25, 2009

Bleased are the...wealthy?


Contrary to what some of my more snooty siblings might say we were poor growing up. I mean really poor. In fact, as I get older I have come to appreciate just how poor we really were. Man, we were poor. So I don't know if it was coming from that background, my service in the army, mission to Ukraine or if it is a result of my studies in history and social work but I have come to resent the rich.

Can't stand them. Don't like their big inappropriate homes, expensive impractical vehicles, ridiculous spending habits, or lavish vacations. Jealousy? Perhaps. But I like to think it is because I think of all that money being spent on them and them alone and not on the poor, hungry, or the ill. There are those that might argue, "But they give a lot to charity." Yes, I agree, but what percentage are they giving. It's awfully easy for someone who makes $100 million a year to give a million bucks to charity but that is only one measly percent of their income, obviously if they lived a more "common" lifestyle they could give far more than 1% of their income.

However, I recently began rethinking my harsh feelings about the rich after reading an article in Newsweek called "How the Mighty Have Fallen" with the synopsis of "The rich really aren't like you and me: they're historically recession-proof. But this time they've been hit hard-and we may all be the poorer for it." I don't believe in "Trickle-Down Economics," where if the rich get richer we all benefit, however, this essay pointed out that "The rich get poorer, but no one else gets richer." But what I really wanted to share were some of the statistics the author shared:

  • The big taxes proposed by the Obama administration would only apply to those who make over $250,000 a year, which is about 3% of the entire country. In other words, the vast majority of us would never even be affected by the proposed tax increases
  • "Households with incomes of $100,000 to $200,000 account for 14% of the population but 34% of all spending." This one is crazy because if Heidi was still working full-time as an X-Ray Tech we would fall, just barely, into this bracket. We would make more money than over 80% of American households! But clearly this group has a hard time living within their means. I once saw a statistic that 19% of households that make over $100,000 a year live paycheck to paycheck.
  • During the current recession the top 10% of earners in the country have seen a 26% decrease in their incomes. Ouch. Meanwhile I am complaining that my mileage reimbursement has been decreased 2.5 cents a mile and I am only eligible for a 2% annual raise instead of 3%.
  • In 2006 the richest 1% of the nation's population paid 28% of all taxes and the wealthiest 10% paid 55% of all taxes. Holy cow! In other words, if your reading this blog you did not fall into this category, in fact, you probably fall into the bottom 20% of the nation's earners who only paid 4% of all US taxes yet these seem to be the one's doing most of the complaining.
  • I hate to admit it but the wealthy give A LOT to charity. This article noted that in 2004 the wealthiest 8% of Americans gave 47% of all charitable contributions. However, in 2008 charitable giving dropped 5.7%. Oddly enough food banks have seen a huge increase in charitable giving during the same period of time.
So...where am I going with this? I have no idea. Maybe I am reexamining my place in this crazy, mixed-up capitalistic country. Or maybe I am just cyber-rambling since Heidi is too busy playing with Hank and does not want to pay attention to me. Whatever the reason at least I know I will never fall into richest 3% of the country and won't have to worry about any huge tax increase. I wonder what Jesus would think about these numbers?

6 comments:

Katrine said...

As we've been car shopping I came across a beautiful car that was priced at $80 thousand dollars. Even if I had that money to spend on a car I can't imagine doing so. I have different priorities. Do I feel people who buy those sort of things are foolish? Yes. But do I resent them? No. Because I am very fortunate that it is not my place to judge them. I will leave Christ to look at those statistics and make His judgments. You should go play with Heidi and Henry. I know they would love to have you with them!

Jason, as himself said...

Which of your snooty siblings thinks we weren't poor growing up?

Dad used to say that the rich were all going straight to the telestial kingdom, and they were servants of the devil. Oh, yes he did say that.

There are wonderful wealthy people. There are wonderful poor people. There are awful, selfish rich people. There are awful, selfish poor people.

Lacking Productivity said...

"There are wonderful wealthy people. There are wonderful poor people. There are awful, selfish rich people. There are awful, selfish poor people."

...my thoughts exactly

Sammy said...

Your resentment likely comes from the ideal that those who are more blessed are obligated to give more. And I feel angered for these reasons sometimes as well. However, I don't personally know any outrageously rich people, but the "wealthier" people I've known have almost all been incredibly nice and generous.

I gotta be honest though... I often cringe when I go home and see some of the stuff my upper-middle class parents are buying. Even my parents, who were quite financially strapped for so many years, have (to an extent) started to rationalize irrational expenditures and blurred the line between need, want, and even a few ridiculous wants.

I really do think most of the ethical infractions of this ideal occur amongst the upper middlers. At the same time, I'm glad my parents are there now. It sure is nice to not feel guilty about eating another bowl of cereal anymore.

Sammy said...

I should probably add that my parents are also incredibly generous... always giving. :)

Dayna said...

You caught and corrected one of my misspelled words now it is my turn to help you out! :) I don't know how the wealthy could be Bleased.